|
July-August, 2011
Some
thoughts on Patti Smith's Just Kids
It’s hard to criticize a book
you’ve read twice, especially
when the author and her subject – the photographer Robert
Mapplethorpe
– are two of your favorite artists. But for all that’s
praiseworthy about Patti
Smith’s memoir, Just Kids, which
won the
2010 National Book Award, there were too many occasions when I wished I
had
access to Smith’s source material rather than the book itself.
Revealing as
her story is, Just Kids is far from a
“tell all.”
Smith describes her first
pregnancy: “I was raised at a time
when sex and marriage were absolutely synonymous. There was no
available birth
control and at nineteen I was still naïve about sex” (17).
Of the child’s
father, she explains: “The boy, who was only seventeen, was so
inexperienced
that he could hardly be held accountable. I would have to take care of
things
on my own. I had relieved the boy of responsibility. He was like a moth
struggling within a cocoon and I couldn’t bring myself to disturb
his unwieldy
emergence into the world. I knew there was nothing he could do”
(18).
Smith doesn’t tell us
whether this was the first time she
had sex or whether the boy in question was a boyfriend. Then
there’s the matter
of the boy’s opinion: What was his reaction when he learned Smith
was pregnant
and that she’d “relieve” him of his responsibilities?
Smith also omits the
scene in which she explains the pregnancy – and her plan for
giving up the
child – to her parents.
Later, Smith selectively
omits from Mapplethorpe’s letters. “Even
as he spoke to me of his experiences with other men, he assured me he
loved
me,” is how she paraphrases a letter he wrote her while he was in
San Francisco
(77). Mapplethorpe’s
coming out is a vital part of the book, as is Smith’s reaction to
it. So I wanted
to read Mapplethorpe’s letter verbatim, as opposed to
Smith’s summary of it. The
skeptic in me felt as if she were trying to protect or shape his
biography
and/or legacy, rather than reveal it; as if she were playing Carraway
to his
Gatsby, Matthew to his Jesus.
I had the same doubts
whenever Smith cited her own diary as
a source. “We had a beautiful day that blossomed into an
unusually passionate
night,” she writes of Mapplethorpe. “I happily wrote of
this night in my diary,
adding a small heart like a teenage girl” (134). What a tease!
Why tell us that
you diarized this era without providing an excerpt from the diary
itself?
I’m not suggesting
that I wanted – or expected – Smith to
reveal all things salacious or to flagrantly disregard the privacy of
everyone
in her life story. But there are times when one suspects that her
version of
events sidesteps the reality of her innermost truth. Of the poet, Jim Carroll, she
writes,
“Jim and I had some very sweet times. I’m sure there were
downs as well, but my
memories are served with nostalgia and humor….I know he
didn’t love me but I
adored him anyway. Eventually he just drifted away, leaving me a long
lock of his
red-gold hair” (167).
As I read Just
Kids,
I found myself longing for more details about Smith’s
“downs” – both with
Carroll and with others. I longed for more details in general.
“Of the man who was to become my husband,” she writes of Fred
“Sonic” Smith,
“I wish only to say that he was a king among men and men knew
him” (263). This
manner of writing – another tease, short on specifics –
makes me wish Smith
had said nothing at all about Fred.
Having typed all this, I
don’t want readers to think Just Kids is
mediocre. The shortcomings
of Smith’s reporting peeved the journalist and editor in me. But
I would not
have read it twice if I didn’t enjoy it. Her memoir ought to be
required
reading for Mapplethorpe scholars and American Studies majors examining
1969-1978.
On a personal note, Smith's story
touched the part of me that -- on too many occasions -- has spent my
bottom dollar on a book or record, believing the joy and inspiration
these products provided was well worth the financial risk of their
purchase. There was a time when Smith and Mapplethorpe were not
successful -- they were "just kids" who spent money they didn't have on books, records,
art supplies, and each other. To read their story is to see how dreams
-- and friendships -- can begin with chance encounters and impulse
buys. You'll grasp the magic that put the muse in their music.
Ilan Mochari is the author of the novel Zinsky the Obscure (Fomite Press,
2011). His short stories have appeared or are forthcoming in Keyhole, Stymie, Ruthie's Club and Oysters & Chocolate. In 2009, he received a Literature Artist Fellowship
grant from the
Somerville Arts Council. He is a former staff writer for Inc, and he has also
written for Fortune Small Business and CFO. He has a B.A. in English from Yale University.
|